Monday, April 26, 2010

Hearts led Baby it’s your deal…

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Crunk Feminist Collective by moyazb on 4/25/10

Apparently people across the country are outraged by Erykah Badu's public disrobing.  Perhaps this was a matter of timing.  Had Ms. Badu waited until this month, April, which is Confederacy History Month in southern states like Texas, it might not have been such a big deal–the War of Northern Aggression being all about a state's sovereign right to disrobe black people and buy and sell black bodies all willy-nilly and everything.  Still, no one wants to admit to viewing a black woman's body on her own terms.  That shit's embarrassing.  So much so that Dallas police had to compel one actual witness to come forward so that they could formally charge @fatbellybella with disorderly conduct.

Watch the video.

Guilty as charged. On several counts.  Giving the middle finger to the state by not securing the proper permits to film in the big D (li'l a double-l-a-s)? Guilty.  Resuscitating a beloved dead white man's violently tragic death for purely niggardly purposes?  Guilty.  Removing one's clothes for reasons other than satiating the male gaze?  Guilty.  Demanding that said gaze look at a black body in a non-sexual manner?  Guilty.  Publicly proclaiming a black woman's agency?  Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.  /sarcasm

What was just as interesting as the video was the responses to the video. There were blog posts (here, here and here), Twitter comments (I have a screen shot of Terry McMillan saying something to Erykah we can use), response videos and legal action taken against Erykah. In fact as of today April 20th, Erykah Badu has been charged with disorderly conduct and can either pay a $500 fine, or contest the charge. It will be interesting to see what she does. Which leads me to two questions:

What does it mean that this is a society where women's bodies are used to sell everything from beer to cars, yet the presence of a Black woman's body on her own terms prompts fears about children witnesses and fears of nudity? Let me be clear, a nude body and sexual body are not one in the same. But then again, folks don't have #noactright because the nude white model's at the MOMA got fondled last week by  museum visitors. This happened in an installation, which is apart of the Marina Abramović restrospective, where patrons must walk between two nude female bodies. Full stop. Jen Carlson, writing in Gothamist says,"the Yugoslavian-born performance artist wouldn't be doing her job if she didn't make her audience experience something they haven't before, no?" Two different settings, high art, nudity and folks acting like they have no home training when it comes to seeing a naked female body. One body violated in the moment and another subject to a public scrutiny that's still copping its feel.

Back to Erykah and the Dallas Police Department. The Dallas police received hundreds of calls from outside the state in complaint of Badu's actions.  Badu's pale(r) inspirations, Matt & Kim, generated no such vitriol.  No one lodged complaints out of concern for the poor children who were exposed to the pasty frostbitten (it looked cold right?) bits of a white woman and man.  Erykah's video predicts the retribution by a state that wants to keep people on the straight and narrow.  (Who shot ya?) She did apparently disrupt the order despite the fact that most people weren't even paying attention to her when she did it. Check the disinterest in the bystanders.  Wu-Tang is for the children (RIP, ODB), but according to Dallas police, Erykah ain't.  The DPD said she didn't care about the kids grazing the grassy knoll. This despite her own words on Twitter and in numerous interviews about how she worried that they might be traumatized. So she sent out a telepathic signal to let them know her intent.  Next time, Erykah, use an iPhone.

Despite Badu's best efforts to explain herself (she went on 106 & Park, for fuck's sake), despite her attempt to be intentional, folks had the unmitigated gall to say that they couldn't understand the clip as anything more than a publicity stunt.  Which is to say they'd rather not read or listen…to words.  Which explains several (pop) cultural phenomena, including Sarah Palin and blazing hip-hop and R&B, in general.  (To be sure, Sarah Palin and Erykah Badu will never be mentioned in the same blog entry again.)

What good do your words do if they can't understand you (or stop looking at your ass)?

Let's write a $500 check to the city of Dallas on behalf of Erykah.  The shit might bounce, but the sentiment won't.

Co-authored by moyazb, summer of sam, & mdot



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Tip on it!

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Openly Loving Women is Prolly Radical….

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via New Model Minority by admin on 3/30/10


Yesterday I tweeted a thought, and apparently I touched a cord.

I was so moved by the reaction that I did a screen shot to preserve this history.

The quote is:

Openly Loving women, in a society premised on oppressing women,

is prolly one of the most radical thing you can do.

Agreed?

No?

Related posts:

  1. When we start the evolution all they prolly do is squeal….
  2. Doom. Grim. Forest Whitaker and Toni Morrison, all in one God Loving Blog Post! I Love America
  3. Men and women can actually be friends.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Monday, March 29, 2010

Necessary Fierceness

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 


Its not my day to post but recent events caused me the catch the spirit and pick up the laptop.

If you haven't heard, Erykah Badu released the video to her second song  off her 6th studio Album (Release party @ the crib tomorrow, feel free to roll through) New Amerykah Part II: Return of the Ankh.

*spoiler alert*

In the video, she gets naked. Actually, its not that simple.

A more accurate statement would be that she gets real vulnerable.

We know this not just because of what we see on screen but because of what she has been tweeting about for most of the month. Erykah lets us in to the must private pieces of herself. We witness her thought process, her checking in with friends, family, babies, and their daddies about what she is about to do. She's not asking for permission but letting them know as people are bound to talk and not surprisingly, the web is already filled with people slinging hate her way.

Some folks say she copied Matt and Kim. She says that. She says that the video was inspired by what they did. And frankly what she did seems a lot more intentional and connected to what her relationship with the world is. Additionally, Erykah is reaching a completely different audience than Matt and Kim. One of her tweets led me to this response to the video by someone who is not a part of Matt and Kim's demographic and was able to garner her own meaning from the video. I love that about Erykah. She reaches people where they are while simultaneusly creating  a horizontal loving line that pushes them a bit from where they are.

This album and the one before are incantations. She is using her magic to save her people and get folks to wake up and shake that load off that is groupthink and others expectations. She is being brave even when she's petrified and creating the world she wants to see by daring her audience to push just as she has in her own town!

She's f*cking fierce!

Read other praise by M dot and Summer M!


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

A Southern Gul, Southern Genius Feeding Her Own Meter

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via my best friend gayle by summer of sam on 3/29/10

Though I am ostensibly a U.S. Citizen (some days it feels tenuous as hell), I also have a Crunchy Nation green card, which means my Twitter feed was full of earth mother goddesses, headwraps, and the like drooling over Erykah Badu's new video for "Window Seat," the lead single from her album, New Amerykah Part 2: Return of the Ankh.  They think it's genius; they are probably right.  Erykah Badu makes the best music videos ever.





I had a (non-crunchy) friend tell me that if Erykah Badu started an army she'd enlist.  Erykah Badu is, it seems, magical.  How many other (black) women in the entertainment industry possess agency and respect enough to publicly disrobe in a way that we, as viewers, would find liberating--and not commodifying?  (Magic!)  Seeing Ms. Badu in full art mode, I'm inclined to abandon pacifism, and declare war on whatever enemy Ms. Badu deems worthy of some militaristic wrath.   How can I not want to be down with someone who seems to be so unequivocally herself in world that relies on stereotypes (name a rapper), caricatures (name a rapper), and recycled product (Gaga, meet Madonna) to sustain itself and titillate us? 

I'm sure the blogosphere is bursting with a myriad of responses to the video, analyses especially concerned with the symbolism of Badu removing her clothes and whatnot.  What struck me, however, was the scene Badu creates in which to disrobe: she revises the JFK assassination to do it.  Badu pulls up to the curb in a Lincoln (another assassinated President) with the suicide doors, foreshadowing her figurative death and implying that what she's about to do is the result of her own hand(s).  After walking through part of downtown Dallas, Badu is shot on the Grassy Knoll, the space where witnesses, including Abraham Zapruder, watched the assassination; it's also the foundation for one of the prevailing JFK conspiracy theories. 

What does it mean that Badu reinvigorates a popular American myth (of Camelot)--and its subsequent conspiracy-- for this individuality-saving exercise?  Especially, if I may take it there, since 2009 reminded folks that the "Age of Obama"  was not going to be Chocolate Camelot remixed 2.0.  More specifically, though, lack of understanding and group think may not be the only reasons for assassinating Badu, as she kind of suggests at the end of the video.  The JFK assassination effectively ended and jarred folks out of an idealized image of the presidency.  Camelot died right on that white X.  How often have Badu's fans not lacked understanding, but actually refused to understand the nuances of her as an artist?  So many of the folks who embraced the genius of this latest endeavor only really dig Badu when she's burning incense, and only enthusiastically await this new album because of what the subtitle promises: a (sonic) return to the ankh.    

What's so dope about Erykah's shows is the motley audience she attracts.  I've been to Badu concerts with my mama, my white homegirl, Rachel, and the homie Maegs (a crunchy role model if there ever was one).  And we're all there for different reasons.  Some are waiting for "Tyrone."  Others want Badu the revolutionary.  Many more wait for Badu to articulate their heart break with a cappella version of "Green Eyes."  Everybody, on some level, fucks with Badu, but how many of us have learned to fuck with all of Badu?   We are reluctant to accept her evolution--hence the tattoo.  Yes, we love "Window Seat," but don't we hate "Jump up in the Air" just because Weezy was on it, and not because his verse was lightweight disappointing?

Above all, the assassination at the end of "Window Seat" reminds me of Badu's generation of soul singers, their survival, and our roles in their symbolic, public deaths: Maxwell (he didn't disappear for all those years just because he wanted a vacation, I'm sure), D'Angelo, Lauryn.  Near that pantheon is Dave Chappelle, and perhaps to a lesser extent Aaron McGruder.  What Badu's video harkens, for me at least, is some of her peers' efforts to fully express their artistry, themselves as individuals.  That, of course, is an implicit suicide mission, resulting in public assassination and their subsequent disappearance.  (What happens if the puppet decides to cut its own strings?)  The public, then, is left with nothing to do but masticate on conspiracy theories.  We endlessly speculate on the how's and why's of Lauryn's mental state and D'Angelo's junkie status.  And in the process we kill them...softly.

Maybe Erykah is magical.  She survives.  She time travels.  She dies; we witness her rebirth.  She endures in ways her peers haven't without, in my understanding of her, compromising in the way that others do.  (Will the real Common please stand up?)  It's fascinating to watch an artist maintain her integrity in public.  Makes me want to jump up in the air--and stay there.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Friday, March 26, 2010

loveyourchaos:tiresome:milktrees:Sapiosexual (n): a person who is sexually a...

Another way to describe myself...

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via guerrilla mama on 3/26/10

loveyourchaos:

tiresome:milktrees:

Sapiosexual
 (n): a person who is sexually attracted to intelligence in others.
Sapiosexual
 (adj): of, or relating to, finding intellectual stimulation sexually arousing.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Sunday, February 14, 2010

love OUT LOUD 4 Haiti

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Friday, February 05, 2010

Instant Vintage: Beyonce Brings Sassiness to Nuptials

Instant Vintage: Beyonce Brings Sassiness to Nuptials

It looks as if Sasha's empire is about to get even fiercer. In an unprecedented celebrity branding move, Beyonce Knowles will be unveiling a new twist on an old favorite. Recharged by her infectious and socially conscious lyrics, Knowles has set her empty sights towards ameliorating a serious blight in the African-American community: lack of marital commitment.

On February 8, just in time for Valentine’s Day, Knowles is set to unleash her latest branding endeavor onto the world: a line of engagement and wedding rings. The ring line, not subtly though cleverly called, "Put A Ring On It by Beyonce Knowles," was inspired by Knowles' smash hit, "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)." The legendary jeweler, Tiffany and Co. will carry the line; a less expensive version of the rings will be available at Kay Jewelers, under the similar, but more urban appellation "Put a Rang on It by Bey."



The idea actually came to Knowles during a ring fitting for her faux everyday version of the 20-carat ring given to her by now husband and rap star, Jay-Z. "I was sitting there with my girls [sister and divorcee, Solange Knowles, and former Destiny's Child co-members, Kelly Rowland and Michelle Williams], and they were all complimenting me on the ring design, which I did myself," Knowles said during a phone interview. "Then Kelly mentioned something about a ring line, and I thought it was just an amazing idea," Knowles explained. "I'm so glad I thought of it."

Buyers will have several ring designs to choose from. Tiffany and Co. will offer the Beyonce, an emerald cut four-carat diamond surrounded by 25 yellow diamonds (the number signifying Knowles' alleged age) forming a crown around the larger stone, set atop a platinum band. The other choice is the Solange, a smaller, less gaudy-looking bauble of a princess diamond with bands available in yellow or white gold and silver. Kay Jewelers will make the Kelly, Michelle, and them other 2, respectively, available to its customers.

Though the line has not officially launched, there is considerable excitement and interest surrounding the new product. In fact, Bey marketing prowess is such a tour de force that Mary Jay Williams, founder and CEO of the Ball & Chain Society, an organization that specializes in getting prisoners to marry their respective partners in facility sanctuaries, said that the Kay Jeweler's line will be the official rings used in all future ceremonies.

"People think that prisoners should be using their money on things other than wedding rings, perhaps on things like a new suit for job interviews or lawyers fees. We disagree. And now Beyonce has made our work so much easier with this line. You can't put a price on the happiness of being in a relationship that is recognized in the eyes of the Lord and saviour Jesus Christ. And with the new payment plan option, you don't have to!" Williams exclaimed.

Monica Chanel Jefferson, of Indianapolis, IN, is already a satisfied customer. Jefferson's boyfriend of four years surprised her with an advanced copy of the Solange when he proposed to her during a First Friday's club event earlier this month. "I'll never forget it," Jefferson, an accountant, recounts excitedly. "We had gone to dinner with friends at P.F. Chang's earlier that evening. Then, during the [First Friday's presents:] John Legend show, [fiance Alexander Deshawn Whitmore] pulled me on stage and asked me to marry him. Then John Legend played 'No Other Love.' That's our song." Jefferson spoke enthusiastically about her engagement ring, and says she'd love to have a wedding ring from Knowles' line. "I cannot wait to be Monica Chanel Jefferson-Whitmore," she added. The young couple met at an Urban League young professionals networking event. They plan to wed in June at the groom's parents' suburban Atlanta, GA home.

Knowles' people hope that Williams' and Jefferson's positive reaction to the line aren't unique. They've put a considerable amount of capital into the line, including a star-studded product launch event to be held at the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas, NV on February 12 where the likes of Samuel Jackson, Denzel Washington, and Kobe Bryant will make appearances. Though invited, neither Diddy nor Lil Wayne, two of hip hop's most notorious baby daddies, are expected to attend. The soiree will feature hand models, a performance by Knowles, and a special broom jumping section where the Reverend Jesse Jackson will marry interested couples. Willing participants will receive 30% off of anybling from the "Put a Ring on It Line." "I don't want to be just another diva," Knowles said. "I want to be a way of life." Indeed, Beyonce. Indeed.It looks as if Sasha's empire is about to get even fiercer. In an unprecedented celebrity branding move, Beyonce Knowles will be unveiling a new twist on an old favorite. Recharged by her infectious and socially conscious lyrics, Knowles has set her empty sights towards ameliorating a serious blight in the African-American community: lack of marital commitment. On February 8, just in time for Valentine’s Day, Knowles is set to unleash her latest branding endeavor onto the world: a line of engagement and wedding rings. The ring line, not subtly though cleverly called, "Put A Ring On It by Beyonce Knowles," was inspired by Knowles' smash hit, "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)." The legendary jeweler, Tiffany and Co. will carry the line; a less expensive version of the rings will be available at Kay Jewelers, under the similar, but more urban appellation "Put a Rang on It by Bey." The idea actually came to Knowles during a ring fitting for her faux everyday version of the 20-carat ring given to her by now husband and rap star, Jay-Z. "I was sitting there with my girls [sister and divorcee, Solange Knowles, and former Destiny's Child co-members, Kelly Rowland and Michelle Williams], and they were all complimenting me on the ring design, which I did myself," Knowles said during a phone interview. "Then Kelly mentioned something about a ring line, and I thought it was just an amazing idea," Knowles explained. "I'm so glad I thought of it."Buyers will have several ring designs to choose from. Tiffany and Co. will offer the Beyonce, an emerald cut four-carat diamond surrounded by 25 yellow diamonds (the number signifying Knowles' alleged age) forming a crown around the larger stone, set atop a platinum band. The other choice is the Solange, a smaller, less gaudy-looking bauble of a princess diamond with bands available in yellow or white gold and silver. Kay Jewelers will make the Kelly, Michelle, and them other 2, respectively, available to its customers. Though the line has not officially launched, there is considerable excitement and interest surrounding the new product. In fact, Bey marketing prowess is such a tour de force that Mary Jay Williams, founder and CEO of the Ball & Chain Society, an organization that specializes in getting prisoners to marry their respective partners in facility sanctuaries, said that the Kay Jeweler's line will be the official rings used in all future ceremonies. "People think that prisoners should be using their money on things other than wedding rings, perhaps on things like a new suit for job interviews or lawyers fees. We disagree. And now Beyonce has made our work so much easier with this line. You can't put a price on the happiness of being in a relationship that is recognized in the eyes of the Lord and saviour Jesus Christ. And with the new payment plan option, you don't have to!" Williams exclaimed.Monica Chanel Jefferson, of Indianapolis, IN, is already a satisfied customer. Jefferson's boyfriend of four years surprised her with an advanced copy of the Solange when he proposed to her during a First Friday's club event earlier this month. "I'll never forget it," Jefferson, an accountant, recounts excitedly. "We had gone to dinner with friends at P.F. Chang's earlier that evening. Then, during the [First Friday's presents:] John Legend show, [fiance Alexander Deshawn Whitmore] pulled me on stage and asked me to marry him. Then John Legend played 'No Other Love.' That's our song." Jefferson spoke enthusiastically about her engagement ring, and says she'd love to have a wedding ring from Knowles' line. "I cannot wait to be Monica Chanel Jefferson-Whitmore," she added. The young couple met at an Urban League young professionals networking event. They plan to wed in June at the groom's parents' suburban Atlanta, GA home. Knowles' people hope that Williams' and Jefferson's positive reaction to the line aren't unique. They've put a considerable amount of capital into the line, including a star-studded product launch event to be held at the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas, NV on February 12 where the likes of Samuel Jackson, Denzel Washington, and Kobe Bryant will make appearances. Though invited, neither Diddy nor Lil Wayne, two of hip hop's most notorious baby daddies, are expected to attend. The soiree will feature hand models, a performance by Knowles, and a special broom jumping section where the Reverend Jesse Jackson will marry interested couples. Willing participants will receive 30% off of any bling from the "Put a Ring on It Line." "I don't want to be just another diva," Knowles said. "I want to be a way of life." Indeed, Beyonce. Indeed." class="__wave_paste"> After all, weaves and hour glass figures are fleeting, but diamonds are forever.

*This post was co-authored by Summer of Sam and Moya B. Moya B. wrote all the funny parts.

The yoga cats call this move the downward facing diva

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

metro terrorism: a dc street harassment story.

so important. please read!

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via Freedom Fighter by aliciasanchezgill on 1/31/10


it's 2pm. middle of the day.  December 22nd. you know, a time when most folks are in an all around festive mood. i am on my way back to the office on the blue line metro, coming from a client meeting. if you know anything about dc's metros, you know those four seats at the end of each side of the train. i'm sitting in the front row. observe exhibit a:

i am only moderately aware of my surroundings. i have my headphones in. but the train is very crowded. there are people all around, sitting and standing. i am paying a modest level of attention to the people in front of me and no attention to the single row of passengers right behind me. then I feel a tap on my left shoulder. i immediately whip around, annoyed, because i didn't pause my iPod, and i may miss my favorite part of  "being alive" from "company." to my surprise, man is staring back at me looking very impatient.

he says "I was calling you but you weren't answering, can i talk to you for a minute?" i respond with a calm "no. and you shouldn't touch people you don't know. i'm not interested." he immediately starts screaming at me. he tells me that he has schizophrenia and could kill me if he gets mad. (considering that i work with numerous folks who are living with schizophrenia who are not violent or dangerous, i am more annoyed by people overhearing that awful stereotype than the threat itself, especially on a train crowded with white folks when we are the only two people of color around) he says, "you ugly bitch, if i catch you outside of this train, i will fuck you up, you nasty bitch/hoe, etc." i want to do my hollaback duty, and maybe snap a picture, but we are so close that i'm convinced he will take the phone out of my hand and hit me. i turn around, try to ignore him and put my headphones back in. i am fuming. my skin is hot, i feel the tears welling up in my eyes, but refuse to let him see that he has officially put me back in my place.

he's talking, no, yelling. he's loud. he's waving his hands. there are people all around us.  he is sitting six inches away from me. we are in a sea of white faces. we are the only people of color. i am looking for an ally. the white women (and one man) around me are staring straight ahead, pretending not to notice the very loud obscenities being yelled at me.  when the train stops, i rush off. and I realize, i am two metro stops away from where i am supposed to be going. i am pissed. it's cold. i just added 12 blocks to my walk and now i am so angry that i start to cry.

the woman in the metro kiosk stops me, and asks me if i am ok. the truth is, crying is an understatement. i am practically barreled over in tears. heaving. this may be what a panic attack feels like. my skin is still hot and the tears won't stop for long enough to answer the woman's questions. she's very nice. "are you ok sweetie?" i am stuttering to answer her. i manage to say "a man on the train, he yelled and threatened to kill me. i thought he would get off the train behind me. is he behind me?"

she asked me if i wanted to call the police to make a report. i politely declined stating that "i don't believe in police." she understood, and gave me tissue. she said "i'm so sorry that happened." when i left work that day, i tried to make sense of what was so upsetting.  here's what i came up with:

he went so quickly from trying to "pick me up," to calling me a bitch.  that doesn't surprise me. it was demeaning, shaming, and scary. but not surprising. i know that street harassment has nothing to do with attraction and like other forms of violence, is all about power and control. women and trans folks are so often harassed and shamed in public, making us feel unsafe and unwelcome. i was a target. and when he didn't get what he wanted, i was disposable, and a bitch. and being someone's bitch when you aren't having consensual s&m fun, is whack.

i felt alone and unsafe. it was so hurtful and isolating to watch all of the people around us [not] respond to his threats of violence. i don't know what response i would have liked to see from folks around us, but no one looked up. i was surrounded by white folks and partially convinced that our two black faces were at best, irrelevant. maybe they thought this was typical black behavior. some kind of mating ritual. either way, as a black woman, this society has made it clear time and again, from slavery, and auction blocks, to me on the metro, that i am not to be protected. my black queer woman body is not valuable. it was probably something i was wearing anyway. i was ashamed. and that is what harassment does. shames us into believing that we are not allowed to walk down the street with dignity and respect.

I generally go through the world feeling relatively safe. i am often much more aware of my coloredness than my womanness. although, i realize that i am always both, and i never could, nor would i want to separate them out. they are always connected. i am a survivor. I spent years working at rape crisis centers and domestic violence shelters. i am not oblivious to sexism. but  i so often am in women's agencies, where i am much more aware of my black skin. this moment snapped me back into my sexist reality in a cruel way. i felt helpless. i couldn't go anywhere, there was no one to help me, and i was ashamed and alone. i was genuinely terrified and really worried about my physical safety. i was worried about what all the white people around me were thinking about [violent] black men and [overly sexualized] women as they watched this interaction.

street harassment reminds us of our vulnerability in public spaces. it sets up a power dynamic so that i have to cross the street, i have to respond to male advances when I am not interested, just to maintain safety. street harassment reminds us that men should be the center of attention. it threatens our physical safety. it's not uncommon for verbal harassment to become physical, like the story of Tanganika Stanton in dc, who was killed by what would have otherwise been known as no big deal, or a flirtatious advance. harassment takes away choice. it forces us to interact with harassers, even briefly, when we don't want to. it is not a consensual act. period. if he intended to put me back in my place (which harassment attempts to do), it worked in that moment. i was silenced, afraid, and I felt powerless.

i got on the train last week, for the first time since that incident. as soon as  i got off, i cried.

want to learn more about street harassment, look here: http://www.stopstreetharassment.com/

and in dc: http://hollabackdc.wordpress.com/


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, January 28, 2010

You Probably Should Discard Some of Your Previously Held Notions about Black...

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via elle, phd by elle on 1/27/10

Dear Friends,

Please don't ever "forget" I'm black, even for an hour. That is not a compliment. Colorblindness =/= progressive; Colorblindness = "You a damn lie"

Love,

elle

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Adoptees of Color Roundtable Statement on Haiti

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via Leaving Evidence by Mia Mingus on 1/26/10


A great statement on the adoption of Haitian "orphans" and so, so much more.  I wish i could quote the entire statement.  Fierce and brilliant.  Thank you!

"We bear testimony to the ways in which the intercountry adoption industry has profited from and reinforced neo-liberal structural adjustment policies, aid dependency, population control policies, unsustainable development, corruption, and child trafficking…  We uphold that Haitian children have a right …to a family and a history that is their own and that Haitians themselves have a right to determine what happens to their own children. We resist the racist, colonialist mentality that positions the Western nuclear family as superior to other conceptions of family, and we seek to challenge those who abuse the phrase "Every child deserves a family" to rethink how this phrase is used to justify the removal of children from Haiti for the fulfillment of their own needs and desires. Western and Northern desire for ownership of Haitian children directly contributes to the destruction of existing family and community structures in Haiti. This individualistic desire is supported by the historical and global anti-African sentiment which negates the validity of black mothers and fathers and condones the separation of black children from their families, cultures, and countries of origin."

Click here to read the entire statement: Adoptees of Color Roundtable Statement on Haiti


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Take action and help the people of Haiti

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via Quirky Black Girls by quirky on 1/17/10

Hi,

Like millions of people around the world I've been shocked by the terrible events in Haiti.

Only now is the true scale of the disaster emerging. Reports now suggest as many as 50,000 people may have died, with hundreds of thousands made homeless.

The work ahead to recover from this tragedy is immense. So here's our goal: $890 million for Haiti. That's how much Haiti owes to the International Monetary Fund, the Inter-American Development Bank, and a handful of others.

Sign the petition below to ask Haiti's creditors to act quickly and cancel Haiti's debts:

http://one.org/international/actnow/haiti/index.html?rc=haiti

As Haiti begins to rebuild we can help by lifting this debt.

Together as ONE we can make a difference!

Thanks!

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Fwd: What You're Not Hearing about Haiti (But Should Be)

What You're Not Hearing about Haiti (But Should Be)
by Carl Lindskoog    Published on Thursday, January 14, 2010 by
CommonDreams.org

In the hours following Haiti's devastating earthquake, CNN, the New York Times
and other major news sources adopted a common interpretation for the severe
destruction: the 7.0 earthquake was so devastating because it struck an urban
area that was extremely over-populated and extremely poor.  Houses "built on
top of each other" and constructed by the poor people themselves made for a
fragile city.  And the country's many years of underdevelopment and political
turmoil made the Haitian government ill-prepared to respond to such a disaster.

True enough.  But that's not the whole story.  What's missing is any
explanation of why there are so many Haitians living in and around
Port-au-Prince and why so many of them are forced to survive on so little.
Indeed, even when an explanation is ventured, it is often outrageously false
such as a former U.S. diplomat's testimony on CNN that Port-au-Prince's
overpopulation was due to the fact that Haitians, like most Third World people,
know nothing of birth control.

It may startle news-hungry Americans to learn that these conditions the
American media correctly attributes to magnifying the impact of this tremendous
disaster were largely the product of American policies and an American-led
development model.

>From 1957-1971 Haitians lived under the dark shadow of "Papa Doc" Duvalier, a
brutal dictator who enjoyed U.S. backing because he was seen by Americans as a
reliable anti-Communist. After his death, Duvalier's son, Jean-Claude "Baby
Doc" became President-for-life at the age of 19 and he ruled Haiti until he was
finally overthrown in 1986.  It was in the 1970s and 1980s that Baby Doc and
the United States government and business community worked together to put
Haiti and Haiti's capitol city on track to become what it was on January 12,
2010.

After the coronation of Baby Doc, American planners inside and outside the U.S.
government initiated their plan to transform Haiti into the "Taiwan of the
Caribbean."  This small, poor country situated conveniently close to the United
States was instructed to abandon its agricultural past and develop a robust,
export-oriented manufacturing sector.  This, Duvalier and his allies were told,
was the way toward modernization and economic development.
>From the standpoint of the World Bank and the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) Haiti was the perfect candidate for this
neoliberal facelift.  The entrenched poverty of the Haitian masses could be
used to force them into low-paying jobs sewing baseballs and assembling other
products.

But USAID had plans for the countryside too.  Not only were Haiti's cities to
become exporting bases but so was the countryside, with Haitian agriculture
also reshaped along the lines of export-oriented, market-based production.  To
accomplish this USAID, along with urban industrialists and large landholders,
worked to create agro-processing facilities, even while they increased their
practice of dumping surplus agricultural products from the U.S. on the Haitian
people.

This "aid" from the Americans, along with the structural changes in the
countryside predictably forced Haitian peasants who could no longer survive to
migrate to the cities, especially Port-au-Prince where the new manufacturing
jobs were supposed to be.  However, when they got there they found there
weren't nearly enough manufacturing jobs go around.  The city became more and
more crowded.  Slum areas expanded.  And to meet the housing needs of the
displaced peasants, quickly and cheaply constructed housing was put up,
sometimes placing houses right "on top of each other."

Before too long, however, American planners and Haitian elites decided that
perhaps their development model didn't work so well in Haiti and they abandoned
it.  The consequences of these American-led changes remain, however.
When on the afternoon and evening of January 12, 2010 Haiti experienced that
horrible earthquake and round after round of aftershock the destruction was, no
doubt, greatly worsened by the very real over-crowding and poverty of
Port-au-Prince and the surrounding areas.  But shocked Americans can do more
than shake their heads and, with pity, make a donation.  They can confront
their own country's responsibility for the conditions in Port-au-Prince that
magnified the earthquake's impact, and they can acknowledge America's role in
keeping Haiti from achieving meaningful development.  To accept the incomplete
story of Haiti offered by CNN and the New York Times is to blame Haitians for
being the victims of a scheme that was not of their own making.  As John Milton
wrote, "they who have put out the people's eyes, reproach them of their
blindness."

Carl Lindskoog is an New York City-based activist and history completing a
doctoral degree at the City University of New York.  You can contact him at
cskoog79@yahoo.com

--
ianna hawkins owen
african diaspora studies, phd student
university of california, berkeley
& say it loud, make it plain press

offer white apologetics (instead of just apologizing)

 
 

Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:

 
 

via stuff white people do by macon d on 1/16/10

This is a guest post for swpd by Willow, who writes of herself, "I'm a Midwestern divinity student and geek who believes that trashy science fiction B-movies are the key to surviving grad school. I'm white, Christian, feminist, disabled, and (as someone once said on some TV show) 'twenty pounds of crazy in a five pound bag.'"


"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."


If a white person participates in anti-racism discussions long enough and seriously enough, ze will mess up eventually.* We are all products of a racist society. And when that happens, we need to apologize to the person or people we hurt.

White people tend to be very, very bad at this.

Actually, many of us are very quick to say the two words "I'm sorry." But it rarely ends there. White people, especially, like to keep talking. What are we saying? I did a bit of research, by which I mean I read comments threads on a few blogs. I came to the conclusion that we are not, in fact, apologizing.

I present my research results to you as the "White Apologetics Drinking Game," located in this post's first comment. Credit for the idea goes to Star Wars fandom, RVCBard, and Witchsistah; in proper blogosphere fashion I also offer it in bingo card form (The drinking game is longer due to bingo-card format constraints).

The dictionary I have defines apology as "an expression of remorse for having wronged another person." That's not what white people tend to offer when they've messed up in a discussion on race, which is more like "a sentence or paragraph beginning with the words 'I'm sorry.'"

What I really see white people doing on anti-racist blogs is more like apologetics: "an excuse or a defense." Instead of genuinely expressing remorse for hurting another human being, white people tend to focus on justifying their actions, or on how the accusation makes them feel.

I call this common white behavior "White Apologetics," and I'll say flat out what the problem is here:

White Apologetics supports white supremacy.

Here's how that usually happens:

1. White Apologetics focuses the conversation on the white person.

Suddenly, the conversation is not about stuff white people do [to hurt people of color], but rather how the white person feels about it, or why the white person did it, but is still a good person, really.

But it shouldn't be about us. It should be about the person of color, who we've just hurt.


2. White Apologetics shifts the blame to POC.

Direct examples of this shift include "I'm sorry you took it that way," or "You misunderstood me." Yes, sometimes we state things badly, or don't convey sarcasm well. But misunderstanding our intent is not the fault of the person of color. The peoblem remains: a white person has hurt a person of color. And somehow that's the POC's fault? This is not Earth logic.


3. White Apologetics places an extra burden on POC.

White people tend to think, oddly enough, that when it comes to matters of race, our intentions matter more than the outcome of our actions. 

Let me ask you this -- if you say to me, "Willow, I didn't mean to run over your dog with my car," is my dog any less dead?

In conversations on race with POC, anything like "What I meant was..." is basically saying, "Dear [specific POC], why didn't you read my mind?" In many such cases, it's also saying, "Why can't you stay calm when discussing situations that negatively impact your life every single day?"


4. Still need motivation? White Apologetics makes you a Well-Intentioned White Liberal (WIWL).

White Apologetics is all about appearances. The person trying to apologize? Doesn't actually care about the person ze hurt. The white person only cares that everyone reading understands that ze really, truly is not racist. It's not about being an ally. It's about looking like one.

So, I have a few suggestions for what to do the next time you mess up:

1. Do understand that when a POC asks you to apologize, you probably do need to apologize (not necessarily, but there is an excellent chance).
2. Do read Tami's fantastic explanation, "When Allies Fail."
3. Do reflect on how you might have offended the POC, and do this reflection on your own (instead of blurting it out amidst a conversation on race -- that's an example of something called derailment).
4. If you still don't understand, ask. But give it a shot first.

And when you do ask:

5. Don't explain why you said what you said or did what you did.
6. Don't blame the POC.
7. Don't talk about how you feel.
8. Don't demand forgiveness.
9. Do try with everything in you not to do it again. You might.
10. Do reread your comment before you post it to make sure it isn't all about you.
11. Do understand that messing up does not make you a bad person.

In closing, I ask you to remember this: White Apologetics is a privilege. For white people, apologies to POC are usually about keeping up appearances, about looking good.

However, for many people of color, apologies are a matter of survival.

As Zara writes on this thread,

My "stock thought" when I talk race with white people -- well, I guess in my case it's a stock action -- is to apologize. Over and over and over.[...] I am always aware that I could lose any devotion or affection from my white friends and mentors by saying the wrong thing about race -- so when I talk race with white people, I shove excuses and apologies in there anywhere I can to make it easier for them to stomach. But here's the thing: I'M NOT SORRY.

Remember that. And then think about how you could offer a better apology, better than the common white non-apology that you're probably feeling inclined to give.

--

Guidelines for discussion in the Comments

I have asked Macon to monitor this comment thread carefully to avoid WP apologizing for previous White Apologetics -- especially a thread for this post, which is, ya know, about those White Apologetics.

Fellow white people: are there elements of your behavior that might trigger POC to feel a need to apologize when ze has not, in fact, done anything wrong? How can you change these? (Remember, no White Apologetics!)

Any additions to the drinking game?

Finally, I'm just another struggling, aspiring, wannabe white ally -- am I right about all of this?


*'Ze' and 'zir' are gender-neutral pronouns

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Haiti Earthquake: and solidarity work New Orleans Women's Health Justice Initiative and INCITE



Dear Colleagues, Friends and Allies:

The New Orleans Women's Health Justice Initiative (which emerged out of INCITE-New Orleans  http://www.pomegranatecollective.org/resources.php?articleincite  )
 is one of many organizations trying to coordinate a response to the devastation in Haiti. Please see Shana Griffin's message below as well as useful links if you would like to donate.

The way that Shana draws the historical connections between New Orleans/Katrina and Haiti is brilliant and important to note.

If you would like to help  NOWHJI  coordinate  efforts with these organizations (and women's groups in Haiti) PLEASE contact me and I will pass the word to Shana, Alisa, Nada and other sisters from INCITE. All help and information (esp with people and organizations on the ground) will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks so much,
In solidarity,
piya chatterjee

**************
Peace.

...but in reaching out to folks I know, the following groups are consistently being recommended:

Haiti Emergency Relief Fund
http://www.haitiaction.net/About/HERF/HERF.html

Partners in Health's Sister Organization in Haiti – Zanmi Lasant Clinic
http://www.pih.org/where/Haiti/Haiti.html

Partners in Health
http://www.pih.org/home.html

Doctors Without Borders
http://doctorswithoutborders.org/

Yele Haiti
http://www.yele.org/

Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti
www.ijdh.org

Also, Janvieve, has recently send out a post regarding efforts folks in Atlanta are organizing.  See email below (They're organizing medical supplies, basic toiletries, and related items).  I just emailed her about who they are sending supplies to, as much of what I have been reading and seeing online, people are being advised to send money instead of supplies due to failing infrastructure and the ability of relief workers to move supplies to communities and areas that need them most.  I haven't heard back yet, but I'll keep you all posted. 

Locally, we are considering sending medial supplies, sexual & reproductive health disaster kits, and money.  Also, folks here are organizing a city-wide campaign, as New Orleans and Haiti share a long rich history linked by resistance, geography, and family ties, as the Haitian revolution started 1791 inspired the largest US slave revolt here in New Orleans, which also double the population of free people of color in the area in the early 1800s.  The success of the Haitian Revolution, led to the Napolean decision to "sale" Louisiana to the U.S.  So, as you all can see, besides Hurricane Katrina and the continual tragedies of the hurricanes on the people of Haiti, the devastating situation of the earthquake hits home. 

-shana




From: Janvieve Williams C. <info@lacccenter.org>
To: ambakeysha@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, January 13, 2010 7:11:52 PM
Subject: Please support the people of Haiti through your generous medical supply donations

For Immediate Release
January 13, 2010

Media Contacts
Janvieve Williams Comrie (404) 610 2807
Fredando Jackson (404) 877 8594

Please support the people of Haiti through your generous medical supply donations

 
It is with great sadness and responsibility that we reach out to you.
 
As you may well know by now, the earthquake that took place on January 12th of the present year has devastated the country of Haiti.  The Latin American and Caribbean Community Center, Project South and the Georgia Hunger Coalition have joined efforts and are personally seeking your support in gathering the following donations in an effort to provide much needed relief supplies.

We are in need of the following supplies:
 

Blankets Cotton or Thermal Blankets (Aluminum)
Reading Glasses (Used if used, please indicate prescription)
Feminine Hygiene Products such as Tampons and Sanitary Napkins
Disposable Underwear for Adults (ei. Depends)
Gauze/ Wound Dressing
Eye Pads/ Patches
Bandages (all sizes and uses)
Blood Pressure Monitors
Slings (Arms)
Feeding Tube Attachment/ IV Bags and Medical Tubing
Skin Sanitizer
Diabetes Blood Sugar Indicators and Testing Strips
Urinary Drain Bags
Saline Solution
Calamine Lotion
Case, Pins, Scissors & Forceps
Cough Mixture
Crutches, Adjustable with rubber tips
Detergent, Emulsion
Drinking cups, wax (Lilly type)
Ear Drops (Mineral oil or olive oil)
Ligatures, with needles
Magnesium Sulphate
Milk of Magnesium
Medicine droppers
Mosquito Netting
Medicine glass, graduated
Pencil, indelible

Baby Diapers & Wipes
Soap (Preferably Bar Not Liquid)
Tooth Brushes & Toothpaste
Batteries (Any size)
Anti-Biotic Ointment such Neosporin or Equivalent
Alcohol Wipes
Aspirin or Motrin
Cotton Balls
Q-tips
Medical/ First Aid Supplies
Latex Gloves
Ice Paks & Heat PaksPencil, Dermatographic (Skin marking)
Personal Insecticide (Lice)
Petrolatum, Liquid (heavy)
Pins, Safety (assorted)
Plaster of Paris (Rolls)
Salt tablets
Water Filters
Scissors
Sheets and pillow cases (all sizes, waterproof preferred)
Baking Soda (Sodium Bicarbonate)
Splints, wooden 18" x 3-1/2"
Thermometer, clinical
Tongue depressors, wood
Vitamins- multi caps, oral liquid, Injectable, infant, child and adult- these are a huge priority.
Infant Formula
Eye solutions and cleanser- antibacterial
Nebulizers, Inhalers
IV supplies- needles, bags of fluid, tubing
Anti-inflammatory


If you are coordinating large donations of the above, please contact Brett Cave at 678-349-4751 for more details and information. You can also drop off supplies or your large commercial contribution at Project South located at 9 Gammon Avenue Atlanta, GA 30315.

We will also need financial contributions to cover shipping costs to Haiti, please consider making a contribution at www.lacccenter.org and click Haiti Medical Relief Effort.
 
Thank you for your time and together we can do our part to help.

 

If you would like to make financial donation to organizations working on the ground in Haiti, LACCC suggests

Partners in Health. 
Donate online at: www.pih.org/inforesources/news/Haiti_Earthquake.html or send your contribution to Partners In Health, P.O. Box 845578, Boston, MA 02284-5578

Doctors Without Borders. 
Donate online at www.doctorswithoutborders.org, or toll-free at 1-888-392-0392.  24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  USA Headquarters 333 7th Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY  10001-5004. 

The mission of the Latin American and Caribbean Community Center (LACCC) is to empower the marginalized communities and people of Latin America and the Caribbean who reside in the United States so that they may assert their economic, political, environmental, cultural and social rights www.lacccenter.org. LACCC is based in the Atlanta Georgia and works regionally to educate and organize for human rights, democracy and racial justice in the Americas.

Project South is a grassroots organization based in the US South. For over 23 years , we have created critical spaces for movement building. We work with communities pushed forward by the struggle to strengthen leadership for long-term transformation. Our programs focus on communities of color affected by social control and economic degradation created by historic and current trends of privatization, exploitation, and structural racism in the US. We provide popular political education through our dynamic leadership development models, and we build relationships with organizations and networks across the US and global South. We believe in bottom-up movement building for social, racial, and economic justice on local, regional, national, and global levels.

The Georgia Citizens' Coalition On Hunger (Hunger Coalition) is a statewide network of grassroots organizations and about 700 active individuals, with a mailing list of 2,500 people. The Hunger Coalition works in urban and rural communities in Georgia working with low-income women, public assistance recipients and former recipients, low wage earners and the unemployed.

 

 

PS – Please give generously now. Let's take advantage of this uniq






Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Elin, Moaquin, Jamie, Mo', Catch a ____ by the Toe or F*ck Tiger Woods



Nothing grabs the attention like a well placed expletive.

or a headline about golf's golden (Cablinasian) boy getting caught out there with a "side chick" (or three (or nine)).

I've never been a fan of the term side chick though I suppose it's better than some of the other names circulating for the women straight men have sex with outside of monogamous relationships. The term side chick presumes a certain marginal status, which really belies their prevalence in the world of male celebrity or in Tiger's life in particular.

All of the comments about their (un)attractiveness and more importantly their whiteness to his blackness are not really what this post is about. Clearly in the context of Tiger Wood's infidelity, the one drop rule is still in effect. Scan any sex shop or porn site and you'll surely find evidence of America's obsession with white women having sex with black men. Post-racial world my ass.

The human piece, a woman's hurt at discovering lies and infidelity, gets overlooked and Tiger's transgressions become a profit bearing clusterf*ck of sensational headlines, news stories, blogs and parodies. His wife's pain, or at least having her (American) dream life tarnished, is relegated to the background and folks even have the nerve to defend his actions.

The excuses, the letters of support and words of encouragement being made for him are blowing my mind. Even from sources I normally like. Because he's good at hitting a tiny ball he gets a pass on infidelity? Nope. I'm not biting.

Celebrity culture and sports mania allow men to get off the hook for cheating, abusing, and even killing the women they purport to love. I'm particularly pissed when these men make vows to not do what they've done (and continue to do). Straight folks, what happen to protecting marriage?

I think what is most unbelievably frustrating about this is the fact that these men have options besides cheating. Non-monogamy works for a lot of people. You don't have to get married and even if you do you don't have to be monogamous. All these women are asking is that you keep the promises that you made regarding the relationship and if that's not working anymore, ask for what you need. If fidelity isn't it, man up and say that shit!

It amazes me that men will complain about the rules they set up when they break them. White supremacist capitalist heteropatriarchy privileges the nuclear family and so to be completely successful (and marketable) a man's gotta have the dutiful housewife and the 2.3 kids. But that's not enough. In America, excess doesn't exist so why sleep with one woman if you can sleep with 12?

In general, I don't give a f*ck about Tiger Woods or his lost endorsements. What I do care about is this situation as yet another example of problematic gendered relationships between men and women in this country.